An airport delivered 15 years’ value of growth in five years, a planning inquiry heard.
Plans to extend London Luton Airport’s passenger capability from 18 million to 19 million per yr and amend noise contours have been approved by Luton Borough Council in December.
The airport is owned by the council’s firm, Luton Rising.
A public inquiry is happening after the federal government mentioned the primary elements of improvement must be reviewed.
The airport is run by a separate personal firm, London Luton Airport Operations Limited, which submitted the enlargement plans.
Local protest group Luton and District Association, for the Control of Aircraft Noise (LADACAN) has opposed the plans, the Local Democracy Reporting Service mentioned.
Richard Wald KC, representing the group, mentioned: “This is an application borne of over rapid and non-mitigated increase in throughput, which delivered 15 years’ growth in just five years, causing an out of balance increase in impacts.
“The passenger cap was additionally breached in 2019, 9 full years forward of its expiry and the achievement of a long-term discount of noise contour areas by 2028.”
Mr Wald said the council was “conscious and concerned in the accelerated growth with out taking any efficient steps to implement towards recognized planning breaches”.
“In 2019, by the applicant’s personal admission, some 30 flights throughout the day and 13 by evening have been being flown throughout the busy summer season interval over and above what was correctly permitted, largely by unmodernised plane making extra noise and carbon emissions,” he added.
Mr Wald said due to the alignment of the runway, much of the environmental impact fell on “the cities and villages on north and west Hertfordshire, west into the Aylesbury Vale and Chilterns, and north into Huntingdonshire”.
Representing independent charity CPRE, Gethin Thomas said the plans would “end result in a rise of carbon dioxide and different greenhouse gases”.
“The future reductions promised from 2027 onwards are contingent on the identical promise made beforehand, higher and quieter plane, coupled with a long-term noise technique,” Mr Thomas mentioned.
“CRPE Hertfordshire stays deeply involved these guarantees would not be fulfilled, and the affect on the countryside can be substantial and lengthy lasting.”
John Steel KC, representing Luton Borough Council, said acoustic consultant concluded “there’d be no materials antagonistic affect attributable to the proposed enhance in passengers to 19 million”.
He said there was no national policy that “proposes a cap on or no growth of airports”.
“The reverse is true. Growth could be supported the place justified,” Mr Steel mentioned.