18.7 C
New York

3 House panels asked to probe no-contact apprehension

Published:


3 House panels asked to probe no-contact apprehension

An MMDA site visitors enforcer on the job in Marikina. This photograph was taken on Oct. 18, 2017. (File photograph by GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

MANILA, Philippines — Quezon City Fourth District Rep. Marvin Rillo has filed a decision directing three committees of the House of Representatives to probe the controversial no-contact apprehension coverage (NCAP) carried out in 5 Metro Manila cities amid a rising variety of complaints from motorists.

Under House Resolution No. 237 that Rillo filed, the probe will likely be carried out by the committees on native authorities, Metro Manila improvement, and transportation.

The NCAP coverage — carried out in Parañaque, Manila, Quezon City, San Juan, and Valenzuela. Under that coverage, motorists are fined for violations primarily based on site visitors monitoring by way of closed circuit tv cameras.

However, some motorists with no violations complained of being fined. Some complained of being fined twice for a similar violation.

“Drivers, motorists, public utilities and/or private vehicles in Metro Manila are currently bound to paying alleged multiple and/ or excessive fines and heavy penalties; and inefficiencies and defects, in both the policies and means and/ or grounds for violation of traffic laws, rules, and regulations, as well as the delivery of notices of these violations,” Rillo mentioned within the decision.

He mentioned that. the native governments involved and the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) should determine a manner to handle these points.

In the meantime, Rillo mentioned the NCAP coverage ought to be suspended.

“There is a need to suspend the operation and implementation of all NCAP technologies and policies of the MMDA and LGUs, until the resolution of this investigation in aid of legislation, to prevent further wronging the motorists and the commuting public,” he mentioned.

Last Aug. 10, Surigao del Norte Second District Rep. Robert Ace Barbers delivered a privilege speech questioning the constitutionality of the NCAP. He famous that the fines imposed had been extreme, a violation of Section 19, Article 3 of the Constitution.

Barbers additionally identified on the chance that site visitors violators may very well be penalized beneath two techniques, as some LGUs have their very own model of the NCAP that differs from the one utilized by MMDA.

He additionally careworn that no regulation had been handed barring folks from registering their automobiles due to unpaid fines for site visitors violations.

Additionally, he believes the NCAP system violates the due course of provisions of the Constitution as a result of the seven-day deadline for an alleged site visitors violator’s response or contest is brief.

Barbers additionally referred to as for the investigation and suspension of this system.

The NCAP has been a sizzling matter amongst motorists, particularly these in numerous social media dialogue threads.

They associated circumstances the place letters had been despatched to individuals who didn’t personal the automobile in query, or those that weren’t even within the space on the date of the supposed violation.

There had been additionally cases when the site visitors violations motorists had been cited for had been doubtful — like within the case of a motorist apprehended for utilizing the bike lane. Several Facebook pages claimed that the motorist was solely making a proper flip — and would subsequently want to undergo the bike lane to flip proper.

There are additionally claims that site visitors lights are actually altering quicker or with out warning, trapping motorists into violations.

The points have led the Land Transportation Office (LTO) to search the suspension of NCAP till a radical research is carried out.

RELATED STORIES

Solon wants no-contact apprehension policy probed, stopped immediately

LTO to LGUs: Suspend implementation of ‘no contact apprehension policy’

MMDA respects LGU autonomy on ‘no contact apprehension policy’

atm

Read Next

Don’t miss out on the most recent information and data.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get entry to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & different 70+ titles, share up to 5 devices, pay attention to the information, obtain as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

For suggestions, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

(*3*)



Source: newsinfo.inquirer.internet

Related articles

Recent articles